COVERAGE OF: Libertarian Party news, Gov. Johnson/Gov. Weld for President and we'll talk to LP candidates anywhere, anytime


Brian F. McLaughlin

The Libertarian Identity (TLI) is run by veteran journalist Brian McLaughlin- a former newspaper and magazine writer who has transitioned to the digital world. With a background mainly in sports, McLaughlin has interviewed hundreds of star athletes and big-name head coaches- from the high school level to the professional level. From the NFL, the U.S. National Soccer team to NASCAR and major college football- even covering the local state championship high school team- he has reported on it. And now, he's dedicated to helping the Libertarian voice get out there. Just like in his current sports beat-covering the FCS level of college football as a Senior Writer for HERO Sports in Seattle-McLaughlin truly enjoys covering the underdog who eventually won't be the underdog anymore. Talking to the 'hidden gems' of college football and politics, the individuals who haven't received the hype. That's what we enjoy most.

Three Florida Libertarian Candidates Enter Fall With Momentum, Victories

By Brian McLaughlin

TLI Editor

Typically, an odd-numbered year following a Presidential election cycle would be “exhale” time, but in Florida, 2017 has been anything but for Libertarian candidates.

Former LNC chair Jim Turney (1985-88) filed and qualified for a non-partisan race for Altamonte Springs City Commission, and his incumbent competitor dropped out literally hours later on the final day of qualifying (Sept. 5). Turney will now be unopposed in the November election. No one else qualified.

Altamonte Springs is in the Greater Orlando area.

Two Florida State House special elections will also feature Libertarians in December and February of next year. Recent LP convert Bryan Zemina (Dist. 58) will be in the December SE in the Tampa area, while former Johnson-Weld Field Director Alison Foxall is in a three-party race (Dist. 72) to be held in February in the Sarasota area.

Only eight Florida Libertarians have ever qualified to get on the ballot in a state or federal special election—with Foxall and Zemina being the most recent.



Foxall even achieved ballot access via the petition route, only the second Floridian Libertarian to do that in a special election situation. Her volunteer staff beat the Democrat’s numbers of valid petitions (400 to 391), missing the Republican by just nine.

In an example of the LP synergy being felt in the Sunshine State, Turney actually was part of the petition drive in Foxall’s Sarasota-area district. They all have also donated to each other’s campaigns, a theme that has extended to the already filed 2018 Libertarian candidates.

“The LP in Florida has quality candidates that are in tough special election races … where it won’t be so easy as it was for me,” Turney said. “I hope they have my luck, but they certainly have my support.”

Turney decided to get into his race because he felt the incumbent was vulnerable in his district. Foxall also saw an opportunity in her home district, where she has resided for more than 25 years. The 2016 elected House Rep abruptly announced her resignation in late August, and Foxall decided to run just hours later when she realized the filed Republican James Buchanan didn’t even live in District 72, though he and his wife now plan to relocate there. Two Democrats later entered and will have a primary in December.

“I am stepping up to represent the district that I’ve lived in for 25 years and will carry our constituents’ voices to Tallahassee with me,” Foxall said. “I’m ready to earn my neighbors’ vote so that I can cut wasteful spending, eliminate unnecessary barriers to entry for many industries, and cut individuals’ tax burden here in Florida.”

Florida’s history of Libertarian Special Elections candidates

Zemina worked with Hillsborough county LP leaders Susan Stanley and Kevin O’Neill to set up his race for special election in the greater Tampa area.

“I was motivated to jump into the race due to lack of results with the two-party system,” Zemina said. “All the nation sees, on all levels, is a bitter fight and opposition to each other instead of working together as government should. Neither side truly stands for the values that they claim to stand for, and I feel it’s only right to try to be the one to bring about change like I’ve been talking about for so long. If not me, then who?”

Along with the Florida Libertarians’ successes and work in 2017, there are eight candidates already filed to run in 2018 for federal and statewide elections, and has been previously reported in the LNC newsletter, the Florida town of Frostproof now has two registered Libertarians on city council, with one (Martin Sullivan) elected vice-mayor earlier this year.

Featured post

LPF Hits 30,000 Mark During Post-Election Doldrums of 2016


TLI Managing Editor

It’s not supposed to work like this.

It took 14 years for the Libertarian Party of Florida to hit the 10,000 registered voters mark in 2001, then a little more than a decade longer to hit 20,000 at the end of 2012.

Things are speeding up a bit, as the LPF hit the 30,000 mark this spring – nearly 32,000, to be exact.

May2017-chartIn what is usually considered the political doldrum period of the election cycle – the time immediately following a Presidential election – the LPF grew by 12 percent in just seven months. That’s right … since the November elections, the LPF has grown 12 percent while other parties hardly budged or declined.

The reason? It could be tied to the Florida Department of Elections dismantling the Independent (INT) and Independence (IDF) parties this spring. Some have wondered if voters were confused by these two parties, thinking it was more like an NPA registration than an actual party. Regardless, more than 300,000 Floridian voters were left homeless after those moves this spring.

Regardless of the reason for the recent spike, it’s certainly a positive sign for Florida’s third-largest political party. With 31,631 registered Libertarians as of the May 2017 count, the LPF is well ahead of the fourth-place Green Party (6,605 voters) and others.

“It’s a very exciting moment for the LP,” said Marcos Miralles, Chairman of the LPF. “I think that our organization and our creation of leaders throughout the state will continue to grow the movement. The sooner we recruit candidates for local seats, the faster we can push for membership through the candidates’ campaigns. It’s a win for the Libertarian Party and a win for the citizens of Florida.”

There are other interesting trends to consider. From the pre-election tally in 2006 to the pre-election formal count in 2016, the Libertarian Party of Florida has grown 82 percent when it comes to registered voters, while the Republicans and Democrats both were at 15 percent – while the overall total of voters grew 23 percent.

Oh, and NPAs grew 57 percent during that same period. Conclusion? The pool of registered voters in Florida is growing, while the list of duopoly voters isn’t keeping pace – while the “outlier” voter totals are shooting upwards over the past decade or so.

If this trend continued at the 2006-2016 pace, the LPF would be near 60,000 registered voters in the next decade – and the recent growth has actually been much more rapid.

Florida’s Libertarian Party first held a state convention in 1973 in Orlando and continued holding them until the mid 1980s when the party was dissolved by the state. In 1987, the LP was rejuvenated and the second push really got rolling in the 1992 election season when six Libertarians ran for State House down ballot from Presidential nominee Andre Marrou. Since then, more than 100 Libertarian candidates have run for state office and countless others have run in non-partisan races at the city and county level.

Libertarian Pearl Continues To Grow Far From Where Pearls Grow Naturally – Montana; Special Election is a Week Away

The Marias River isn’t exactly next door to the Pacific Coast. In fact … eventually, it flows into the Gulf of Mexico. You’re not going to see any oyster beds this far up the watery road into the northern reaches of Montana.

MarkWicks-MugshotYet a Libertarian pearl is developing where a grain of Montana river rock sand is irritating the establishment. Mark Wicks, a third-generation Montanan rancher, has been an irritant to the political duopoly in a special election race that has both Republicans and Democrats cursing the opposition.

When Ryan Zinke went to Trump’s cabinet as Secretary of the Interior, Montana’s lone U.S. House seat opened up in the Big Sky. The special election is slated for May 25.

RELATED: Libertarian candidate Mark Wicks (US House, Montana) has a daughter named Liberty and a plan

RELATED: Nearly 12 million spent on Montana U.S. House special election

Wicks said it best when it comes to the reported 12 million dollars that has poured into this race:

“Boy, they’re really wasting money,” Wicks told TLI Tuesday night. “And they’re upsetting Montanans with the amount of Ads they’re having to sit through. They’re trying to prove a point for the Democrat and Republican parties about who is the top dog in the country, and I’d say Montanans should vote for me and let them know we’re not worried about the top dog in the country … We should give them actual feedback on what we’re doing here.”

The Libertarian National Committee has taken notice of the activity and is considering sending funds Wicks’ way to make a point. Hopefully it’s not too late.

“I’ve been in my own race and I haven’t had the time to put time and effort into anything else,” Wicks told TLI. “I think what is important is we need to get a win or a near win at this level.”

Along with the big money, some political big hitters have also spoken up. Vice President Mike Pence has been involved in this special election race, as well as Donald Trump Jr. And good ole’ Bernie Sanders has been involved too.

POLLS: Libertarian polls in double digits three times in Montana U.S. House race

DONATE: Mark Wicks campaign page

Democrats are hell bent on making the current President look like a fool by nabbing a U.S. House spot the Republicans have held for nearly two decades. And Republicans are just as concerned with the “Referendum on Trump” and have put their resources on this case too. Thus Pence and Junior traveling west.

“If I come a little bit short, with only about 10,000 spent, I’m wondering what I could have done with a little bit more money,” Wicks told TLI. “We might have been able to put this one over the top. When you look at it versus the millions the others spent, that could have been big. I think I’m going to be in the double digits here.”

DEBATE: Mark Wicks’ closing statements

While the rest of the political world looks at his home state as a statement battleground, Wicks is sipping his coffee and grinning on the porch, because he’s going to play a major role next week. He made the debate stage, and some Montana media entities even proclaimed he was the winner.

Wicks knows that his 10K has gone a tad bit further than the 12 million of outside money flooding in from goodness knows where …

Next week? We’ll see if Montana is awake and sets the tone for what is coming.

Are Libertarians Constitutionalists?

Awesome write up by Stacey Selleck!

Montana Libertarian Mark Wicks Has A Daughter Named Liberty And A Plan To Change U.S. House’s Political Landscape



There’s nothing more independent than being a rancher whose family has lived on the same 1,600-acre tract for more than a century. When you’re a rancher, you’re not used to outsiders dictating what you can and cannot do … and you don’t dictate to your neighbor, either.

That is exactly where Montana native Mark Wicks is coming from.

MarkWicks-MugshotWicks, 47, is the Libertarian candidate in a pivotal U.S. House Special Election that will take place May 25. Since the national reapportionment in the early 1990s, Montana has had only one U.S. House seat, known as its ‘at-large’ slot.

The U.S. House at-large seat is currently vacant after Ryan Zinke was appointed and confirmed as President Trump’s Secretary of Interior. By state law in Montana, the U.S. House seat has to be filled within 85 to 100 days of the vacancy, which the May 25 special election will do. The seat has been Republican since the late 1990s, but Wicks is out to change that.

This special election has all kinds of national ramifications, as the Democrats are hoping it will become a referendum on Trump’s first 100 days in office. Republicans are spending big money to avoid the potential embarrassment. The money has been flowing and the political pop stars are finding their way to Big Sky Country.

Wicks wants to throw a gold-embossed wrench into the rusty machinery, Libertarian style.

“I don’t think you have to worry about me being the spoiler because I have no intention of coming in third,” Wicks quipped during his interview on Tuesday with The Libertarian Identity.

RELATED: Mark Wicks Campaign Donation Page

RELATED: Libertarian Mark Wicks’ campaign page

On April 29, Wicks was in a televised debate (See KTVQ Debate) with Democrat Rob Quist and Republican Greg Gianforte, and the Libertarian reaction to his performance has been positive. Also, in two polls so far, Wicks has peaked at 11%.

Wicks told TLI he’s always been a Libertarian. Though LPs don’t register as such in the open primary state of Montana, he said he has voted for Libertarian candidates since he was 18 – when they were an option on the ballot, which oftentimes they weren’t.

“When you live out here and do everything on your own, you feel the freedom to do whatever you want however you want, and then you see people trying to stop you from doing what you choose … it leaves a bad taste,” Wicks said. “The people all around me are very independent people. We don’t like government telling us what to do. My family has taken care of this land for more than 100 years without the government’s help.”

RELATED: Huffington Post – Special Election Nobody Is Following Could Deal A Huge Blow to Trump

HillCountyMontanaWicks and his family of six reside in Hill County, Montana near the town of Inverness – just south of the Canadian border in north central Montana. His grandparents came to the area in 1913 to be ranchers. He currently raises cattle on his land, along with his haying operation.

“We finally paid it off,” Wicks joked, when asked about the property. “We might even turn a profit one of these days.”

He and his family also transport agricultural goods westward during peak season. Most people who ranch also have jobs outside the home, or at least one of the adults does. He and his wife of 21 years, Beth, are part of the rural route post office operation locally. Their oldest son Hunter (18) is at Montana State-Northern in Havre, studying agricultural technology. Jewel (16) is a high school student who Wicks said may be the next politician in the brood. Choral (12) and Liberty (5) – yes, Liberty – round out the family.

With so much responsibility at home already in hand, Wicks did go back-and-forth with the decision to enter this race as a Libertarian. But, he looked at this as another responsibility he couldn’t shirk.

RELATED: Libertarian Mark Wicks’ campaign page

“I had been kind of thinking about doing this for a long time and I kept looking at whether this is the right time in our lives, and are the kids the right age for this,” Wicks said. “And I came to the conclusion that this wasn’t really the perfect time in my life for this, but I thought it looked so bad if people didn’t step up and do something in this race.”

On March 11th, the MTLP held a convention in Helena and Wicks won on the third ballot with 56% after eight LP candidates originally threw their hats in.

When it comes to his strongest Libertarian stances, Wicks doesn’t hesitate to bring up the fiscal responsibility side of the equation. He feels that if he has to run a balanced budget in his own home to survive, the Federal Government should too. He said he’d be behind massive spending cuts and would fight in Congress to make it happen – that, first and foremost is his major push. He doesn’t feel either of the older parties attempt to cut spending anymore. It is his biggest beef.

LibertarianPartyMontanaWicks’ (BallotPedia page) next biggest sticking point is education. For decades, his family tree knew well the successes of the hyper local one-room schoolhouse – that they didn’t need federal intervention to educate.

“It’s really important to me,” Wicks said. “It sounds like common core is going away, and that really needed to be done. I think we should phase out the Department of Education. We have good teachers in this state, and there’s nothing that another level of government is going to tell our teachers that they don’t already have a handle on.

“Let the states decide to teach their students instead of this one-size fits all setup. Our students have a lot of different needs than those in New York and California.”

Already, he achieved a victory when it came to reaching the debate stage to sit equally with Quist and Gianforte. But it didn’t come easily. Two earlier debates were cancelled for no reason, and he wasn’t even notified about two editorial board dates in some Montana’s larger towns/publications.

RELATED: Roundtable video reaction to April 29 Montana U.S. House debate

Wicks originally received an email saying he would be excluded from the KTVQ debate. He immediately got ahold of Montana Libertarian Party (MTLP) leaders Ron Vandevender (State Chairman) and Michael Fucci, as well as LNC Region 1 Rep Caryn Ann Harlos and they helped raise awareness of Wicks’ snub, and ultimately helped get the decision turned around. KTVQ News Director Jon Stepanek first message cited time constraints as their reason for not inviting Wicks to the Billings debate.

“We just started sending the word out, not just to Libertarians but across the board and people were upset that we were being excluded and it started coming together,” Wicks said. “We proved that we met the standards they set for us. We have two unpopular candidates who are both weak. We have a chance here, this is a very Libertarian state.”

His competitors? Wicks sees them as identical twins. What exactly is the difference? In fact, he points to their TV advertisements as an example. Both have televised ads shooting televisions.

“I’ve told PETA …you know, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Appliances … that I won’t be shooting any TVs in this campaign,” Wicks said.

We’re down to 23 days on this one, sports fans.

Want to see the full U.S. House debate from April 29? Click me!

Featured post

Registered Libertarians Now Comprise 40% Of One Florida Town’s City Council



One of the big pushes within the Libertarian movement is to be active on a hyper-local level – and there’s no better way to be active than to face that challenge head on and run for office on behalf of your friends and neighbors.

Five-generation Frostproof (Fla.) native Martin Sullivan is a two-year veteran of his hometown’s City Council, and on Tuesday evening he was elected Vice Mayor of Frostproof. But he wasn’t the only big news for Libertarians, as newly converted LP registrant Austin Gravley was also sworn in for his first term. Gravley won his seat with 62 percent of the vote on April 4, and had registered LP just one day prior.

FrostproofFloridaMapToday, 40 percent of the Frostproof City Council is sticking up for what Libertarians believe in – starting with fiscal responsibility. While city council elections are non-party affiliated, the platform carries over.

“I just found myself aligning more and more with Libertarian views,” Gravley, 25, told TLI. “I like the idea of government leaving everybody alone. I’ll admit I was a Republican before … but I just don’t want to keep going down this road where we have two options, big government or bigger government. So maybe I just wanted to prove a point by switching to the Libertarian Party … I like the idea of having a third party.”

Sullivan is one of only 11 mayors or vice-mayors nationwide who are registered Libertarians, and only four municipalities in the country have more than one registered Libertarian on their council. See list below this story for details (source,

Sullivan and Gravley both face the reality of their hometown’s fiscal challenges. Their primary focus is to cut costs and preserve the identity of a town that has had Sullivan’s family in the vicinity since the 1880s, along with three generations of Gravley’s family. It is a fiercely independent town, which has led to a mostly Republican electorate being open to two men who align with a different political ideology. With the citrus industry struggling, it has been forced to brainstorm the new direction.

Maybe having two Libertarians in the leadership is a start?

RELATED: TLI Talks to LNC Chair Nick Sarwark

The biggest goal for Frostproof? It doesn’t want to be gobbled up by the bigger fish of Polk County and central Florida. It’s a town that is proud of its history – as evidenced by the Centennial celebration that will take place next year. Sullivan said one of his biggest goals as a city leader is to try to figure out what is the next step for a town whose primary economic base has been the citrus industry – for most of the past century.

So it’s a three-headed challenge. First, fend off outside interests that in many ways want to absorb Frostproof. Second, avoid forcing the residents to swallow a heaping dose of “taxation without representation”. Third, figure out the best way to market the area’s top attributes – like its lakes and winter climate, its natural attributes.

The town of about 3,000 residents is in a transition, and two Libertarians want to be a part of the solution, not the demise.

Sullivan’s winning message back during his first election in 2015 was to keep the local volunteer fire department independent of the county because it ultimately would keep things cheaper and independent. There were also worries that a consolidation with Polk County’s services may mean longer response times – meaning paying more, potentially for lower quality. Sullivan’s push to rescind the previous council’s decision to hand things over to the county was what got him elected.

Another big pushback has come against powerful outside influences wanting to siphon off Frostproof’s water. Sullivan has fought that initiative, along with other council members. Again, battling for his constituents, though Sullivan admits it probably won’t be the last time these strong interests will come from the growing Orlando Metro area – which is thirsty and searching.

“We keep reminding the people that it is their money, and the one thing about Frostproof is it is a really independent-minded town,” Sullivan, 46, told TLI. “They already have that mindset. They see how the town was built originally, built privately with very little government intervention. We’re just a small, rural, isolated town in the southeast part of the county and we’ve never really gotten any real help from anybody.

“There are some who would like for us to unincorporate and be a part of the county so they can absorb our tax base, and we’ll continue to have that fight with them.”

Sullivan, who today works in the Citrus industry, and Gravley, who is an independent distributor, both say their primary focus moving forward will be to keep the budget under control. With his three-year term, Sullivan will be up for re-election in 2018, while Gravley will be on board until 2020. Sullivan said he’ll continue to run for office, that this isn’t a one-time thing.

One of the rallying points for the community is Frostproof Middle-High School, and the mascot is the Bulldog — known for its tenacity and bite when provoked, yet also known for its calmer demeanor when left alone …

… an appropriate mascot for this community and its most recently elected leaders.

The Frostproof duo join Marco Island City Councilman Jared Grifoni as registered Libertarians on city councils in Florida, along with several elected municipal positions in Miami-Dade – held by Gary Gerstein, Keon Grayson, Marco Alvarez Jr. and Marialexandra Garcia, Dennis Misigoy, all Libertarians (SOURCE:

Arkansas, Bobby Tullis, Mineral Springs Mayor
California, Jeff Hewitt, Calimesa Mayor
Colorado, Beau Woodcock, Milliken Mayor
Florida, Martin Sullivan, Frostproof Vice-Mayor
Illinois, Tami Wessel, Brookport Mayor
Kentucky, Larry Odom-Groh, Bellemeade Mayor
Maryland, Leo Martin, Mtn Lake Park Mayor
Montana, Michael Schoenike, Red Lodge Mayor
Pennsylvania, Timothy A. Russell, Emlenton Mayor
South Carolina, Bill Woolsey, James Island Mayor
Washington, Bob Bromley, Sumas Mayor


Frostproof, Florida

Crystal City, Minnesota

Cressona Borough, Pennsylvania

Lago Vista, Texas

Libertarian U.S. Senate candidate Paul Stanton questions whether FEC regulations were violated with debate invitations


For more information, contact:

Brian McLaughlin | Media Director – Committee to Elect Paul Stanton

Email: |Twitter: @BrianMacWriter

DELAND, Fla. (Oct. 26, 2016): Libertarians are used to being excluded from debates in Florida, so the lack of an invitation tonight for candidate Paul Stanton isn’t surprising. While Rubio and Murphy meet at Broward College this evening, the Stanton campaign is staring at the FEC regulations, wondering why they haven’t been enforced.

On Sept. 1, two days after the primaries, Rubio and Murphy were invited to tonight’s debate—and both accepted. While the debate criteria stated that the ‘qualified’ poll to earn an invitation had to be conducted during the month of September, the Democrat and Republican were invited before any general-election polling even occurred. Most polls take a minimum of 3-to-4 days to run their full cycle. The only polls coming out prior to Sept. 1 were primary polls and hypothetical matchup polls. So why were invitations extended prior to a ‘independent, reputable poll’ being selected?

In early October—in response to inquiries by the Stanton campaign—the debate organizers stated that the poll they deemed the debate ‘qualifier’ was the Mason Dixon poll conducted from Sept. 27-29.

So why did the first two candidates get an invitation on Sept. 1? Was it simply because they were from the Republican and Democratic parties?

Here is what FEC regulations state ( 11 CFR 110.13): “For all debates, staging organization(s) must use pre-established objective criteria to determine which candidates may participate in a debate. For general election debates, staging organizations(s) shall not use nomination by a particular political party as the sole objective criterion to determine whether to include a candidate in a debate.”

The debate organizers—Florida Press Association and Leadership Florida—established official debate criteria (12.5% threshold, 3.5% margin of error, 815 or more ‘likely Florida voters’) immediately following the primaries on Aug. 30. Stanton met that criteria threshold twice in September in PPP polling, only to have those PPP polls disqualified because of technicalities.

Stanton has polled at 10, 9 and 6 percent in three PPP polls, as well as 5 percent in the chosen Mason-Dixon poll. A recent straw poll at the University of South Florida had Stanton at 7 percent. In the 2010 Florida U.S. Senate election, 5 percent of the vote would have equated to 270,000 votes.

Without even needing to go further, this debate violates stated regulations. Yet FEC regulations are rarely enforced. So for the third time in six years, a military veteran who is running for office in Florida as a Libertarian (Alex Snitker for U.S. Senate in 2010, Adrian Wyllie for Governor in 2014 and now Paul Stanton) is being excluded from debates, thus diminishing the candidate’s ability to be heard.

Paul Stanton could be louder about this potential violation, but has decided not to pursue this issue in the legal system. He does, however, wish to publicize the continued abuses of power that take place when it comes to the Republican and Democratic parties. We have seen it in the presidential campaign, and now we are getting a taste of it closer to home in Florida.

Stanton reacted: “I would have a strong case, but even if we pursued this through the court system and won, we would be using government coercion to force a political agenda on a private entity. As a Libertarian, I oppose that type of government coercion. Even though I won’t file a complaint, I think these questions should be raised.”

Paul Stanton is a U.S. Army veteran who served in Iraq, receiving his honorable discharge as a Sergeant. Following his service, he became an outspoken Libertarian activist. Stanton feels he is the ‘Peace Candidate’ in the race. He currently resides in DeLand, Florida working in computer programming and data analytics. He captured the historic first statewide Libertarian primary back in late August.

Johnson-Weld Signs Are Being Stolen Now,We Are Definitely Spooking Them


Tuesday morning, I did a quick spin through the local community to check on my campaign signs for Johnson-Weld.

About 90 percent of the signs I put out were missing. This is after 10 days of not being touched–and the ones that did remain (mostly at the busy early voting centers that opened Monday) had Hillary Clinton signs placed about two feet in front of my Johnson-Weld signs. This blocked the sight lines for the precious few they didn’t swipe.

All of this happened between 3 p.m. Monday afternoon and my Tuesday morning ‘check’. This morning (Wednesday), another check found two more of my remaining Johnson signs had been plucked overnight, sometimes with the metal stands still intact (see photo above) while other local campaign signs are still standing just feet away.

Case in point? This isn’t the mowers moving pesky signs so they can do their job, or county workers removing campaign swag, or a kid playing tricks–this was a targeted 24-hour concerted effort. It might just be local Hillary volunteers doing their own thing, or maybe it’s an edict from above? Who knows.

But it means they’re scared, and they should be. Is this anecdotal? Yes. Is it indicative? Good question right?

Oddly, the Trump signs didn’t have Hillary signs placed two feet in front of them. Interesting.

Again, most of my signs … signs I have paid my own good money for … are gone. They aren’t tossed in the weeds behind where we placed them, or in a nearby trash can. They’re gone. When I mentioned this on social media Tuesday morning, it appears Johnson-Weld signs are disappearing in many locations both statewide and nationally.

It’s two weeks out and the fossil parties are getting frantic. Maybe their internal polls are scaring them, because we all know the public polls are BS.

Admittedly, I’m new to all this craziness. I’d never done much more than get a Ron Paul yard sign in the primaries in 2008 and 2012 and I never got diehard into campaigning until this year. I’ve put many dollars and hours into this year’s campaigns.

This was the sign you stole, jerk – the one my 6-year daughter begged us to assemble prior to the last sign drop.

Though new to all this, I’m not naive … I know this crap happens.

It just pisses me off that I spent 100s of dollars on donations and received dozens of signs in return, only to have some fool think it’s OK to steal them ‘for their cause’.

I’m making the assumption here that this is a Hillary supporter(s), based on the consistent placement of her signs in front of ours. That plus the known fear the Clinton camp has of Gov. Johnson taking precious votes away from her in the most important state in the nation — Florida.

Doesn’t this just exemplify the difference in principles between a Libertarian and a ‘by all means necessary’ Democrat? Think about it, two key things were violated here:

No. 1) Don’t mess with my personal property. I paid for those signs with money out of my excessively taxed paycheck and put them in appropriate places where other signs were located. In the end, they didn’t steal all of the other local race signs and amendment measure signs – these clowns only stole mine.

No. 2) You messed with my freedom to be heard. You have a right to it, I have a right to it. It’s third-grade civics. Need a refresher course? 

Oh, and there’s that other minor detail … it’s against the damned law.

I’m so mad I could spit right now. And to hear this is happening to Johnson-Weld signs all over the place, specifically when we are a grassroots operation that doesn’t have millions of dollars sitting around? It makes you want to do the same thing to theirs …

BUT I refuse to do that. Even though I doubt these idiots actually spent their own money on the signs (Soros wrote a check for it and likely bought them all a steak dinner), I do support their right to free speech, even though they don’t have a clue of what to do with that strange thing called freedom. They know all about the first half of the word, the ‘free’ part, but the complete version makes them scratch their heads.

Call me naive, call me whiny, call me a Boy Scout for believing in the ideals above–but I do believe in them and I will never become a cynic and change.

Also, if I catch you in the act of doing the above, I’d be exercising my right to split your lip and color you black and blue.

Game on.

Americans, This Debate Exclusion Rubbish Must Stop Now-END IT



Folks, when are you going to start screaming about being deprived?

You scream bloody murder when your NFL game isn’t on TV because of a cable negotiations. You scream bloody murder when ‘The Walking Dead’ is preempted by major national news. You scream bloody murder when the grocery store only has two lanes open.

But you don’t scream bloody murder when you’re starved of the chance to get to know a potential leader. Nobody bats an eyelid about it.

RELATED: Libertarian U.S. Senate candidate Paul Stanton qualifies for Oct. 26 debate, awaits official invitation

Governor Gary Johnson and Governor Bill Weld are being left out of the debates based on twisted technicalities, and we all know nobody knew a damned thing about Bernie Sanders before he got into the debates with Hillary Clinton.

stanton-genelectionballotIn Florida, U.S. Senate candidate Paul Stanton actually met the debate criteria for the Oct. 26 event at Broward College. His debate fate? Eliminated on technicalities just hours before a hurricane hit.

Johnson and Stanton aren’t losing, you are.

Johnson has polled as highly as 13-percent (twice) in national polls and in the double digits 23 times this year. If you use the 2012 presidential vote totals, that translates to no less than 12,750,000 million votes.

Are you telling me a candidate that could get 12 million votes shouldn’t be on the stinking debate stage to make his pitch to the FINALLY tuned in American public? Hey, if Johnson finishes with 8 percent, that’s still nearly 10 million votes. Even 5 percent? Do the math-6 million Americans chose the guy.

How does that kind of support not reserve a spot on the debate stage … especially against these two clowns who in two debates still haven’t actually debated an actual election issue?

With Stanton, it’s the same damned thing-just on a smaller scale. Stanton has polled at 10 percent, 9 percent, 5 percent and today (Oct. 14) polled at 6 percent in the most recent PPP poll.

RELATED: Get to know Florida U.S. Senate candidate Paul Stanton

Let’s just say he finishes with 5 percent-his worst poll. That’s still 271,000 votes based on the 2010 U.S. Senatorial election numbers in Florida.

So let me repeat myself, Floridians: Pollsters have said Paul Stanton’s the choice of between 5 percent and 10 percent of prospective voters in Florida. That translates to between 271,000 and 542,000 voters.

But nah, let’s just leave Paul Stanton off stage. He’s just a sideshow, the committees seem to think. Again, Paul’s not losing here … you are.

See, here’s what I don’t get. Every frickin’ election season of my life, I’ve listened to people bitch and moan in the 11th hour that they don’t have enough options on the ballot.

“Are these the only two options we have? They both stink.”


Well yeah, of course they stink. These two parties have both been sitting around for 150-plus years, fermenting.

There are other options right in front of you, but because you don’t do your homework, you don’t hear about them until you get your sample ballot.

You want options? Let me tell you about options. They are in the Libertarian Party and this train is leaving the station. It’s still moving slowly enough (for now) for you to jump on and enjoy the scenery while we make stops along the way.

Man … people say they don’t have faith in the future? That couldn’t be further from the truth. In one of the PPP polls Paul Stanton was included in, he drew 19 percent of the millennial vote. Gov. Johnson polls in the 30s with millennials.

So the good news is, this will all be changing.

All in all, this election season is a big, fat victory no matter how you look at it. Johnson received 1.3 million in the presidential election four years ago. This year, at the very worst, he’ll quindruple that and he may even affect the electoral college–with absolutely zero help from the debate stage or 99-percent of the mainstream ‘pundits’.

Stanton will also likely surpass by leaps and bounds the vote totals that Libertarian candidate Alex Snitker worked extremely hard for in 2010. That groundwork has been laid and advanced, and Stanton took the cause even further when he captured the first Libertarian statewide primary in Florida history. That fact will be celebrated 50 years from now, when the fossil parties are ‘taking cues from the Libertarians’, as LP National Committee chair Nick Sarwark likes to say.

As far as the debates are concerned, it’s a game of coulda, woulda, shoulda, I admit-but if Johnson and Stanton had made the debate stage this year, it may have accelerated the LP’s growth exponentially, both nationally and statewide. But this LP crew is used to baby steps. It has been forced to do it this way for years, and it’ll keep doing it.

All I ask, after this monumental year for Libertarians … quit saying you don’t have options when there’s the massive Golden Torch of Liberty staring back at you, inviting you to take part. And let’s make sure this debate snub crap ends this year. To fix it, it takes a loud response from voters.

You have options, don’t forget that next time.


Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑